> Uses a lot more words than the substance it has. Not sure that's enough to start the witch-hunt: It was common long before LLMs came around. :p > Mentions

> Uses a lot more words than the substance it has. Not sure that's enough to start the witch-hunt: It was common long before LLMs came around. :p > Mentions the boy, the Socrates effect etc repeatedly but does explain what that means until very late in the post. When I highlight some words and zoom out, it's explained within two paragraphs of being introduced, and only because the intervening one is describing the other half of the comparison.