3 ms·
Banning something that you ban for adults as well is defensible. Insisting kids follow a standard of "healthy" that you won't apply to yourself smacks of hypocr
by lmm 2y ago
Banning something that you ban for adults as well is defensible. Insisting kids follow a standard of "healthy" that you won't apply to yourself smacks of hypocrisy and bullying.
- bdangubic 2y agoyou cannot possibly be serious, right? no “learn from my mistakes eh?” if I am a heavy smoker, heavy drinker etc I have to make sure my 11-year old lights up with me and cracks open a bottle after a long day in school…? still hoping you are joking though…
- s1artibartfast 2y agoThey're not making the argument you think they are. They are saying leaving by example is a good tool. They are not saying that every single rule must be symmetric
- bdangubic 2y ago> Insisting kids follow a standard of "healthy" that you won't apply to yourself smacks of hypocrisy and bullying. don’t think you are following or reading…
- s1artibartfast 2y agoI thought we are talking about cellphones here. Yeah, a lot of there time hypocrisy exists. Hence, leading by example is a good tool. You're the only one trying to apply to every single edge case imaginable. No, you don't have to stop driving a car either just because you won't let your toddler take the wheel.