3 ms·
"As proxied BY my landlord" I am speaking of my rights in the community, not to the property. That is, should there be a speed bump on the street, should a Wal
by tgrass 14y ago
"As proxied BY my landlord"
I am speaking of my rights in the community, not to the property. That is, should there be a speed bump on the street, should a WalMart be allowed to build on the condemned lot around the corner.
- sp332 14y agoI think it's still true that you have somewhat less rights since you're not (directly) paying the property taxes.
- mseebach 14y agoThen you're moving into tautological territory. Those rights are held by your landlord. If he proxies them to you, then you have them, if he doesn't, you don't.
- tgrass 14y agoI am thinking of instances where a landlord's interest are aligned with tenants generally. For instance, fighting neighborhoods who use political connections to oppose rental development in central city neighborhoods ("mini dorms"). Discrimination is discrimination. These are public neighborhoods. Protecting one's property value does not make discrimination noble or any less discriminatory.
- rprasad 14y agoIf you are a voter, you have the same rights by law, and this would apply to the issues you brought up. If you are not a voter, you do not and should not have the same rights because your social and economic investment in the community is not as great as your landlord's, or your underwater neighbor's.