4 ms·
Why aren’t they all hdmi 2.0, isn’t it backwards compatible? Or it’s just to save them a $ while technically still being able to advertise it as hdmi 2.0 ?
by radicality 2y ago
Why aren’t they all hdmi 2.0, isn’t it backwards compatible? Or it’s just to save them a $ while technically still being able to advertise it as hdmi 2.0 ?
- doubled112 2y agoI'm going to assume it was cost cutting. The boss said to make sure it had an HDMI 2 port. The engineer could have interpreted it two ways, so they did both ways in one.
- Iulioh 2y agoProbably it would need a better CPU to handle more traces and that's the real expense