Claude is great, I think Claude 3.5 Sonnet is way better than OpenAI's GPT-4. It understands and follows instructions better, and the context length is larger t

Claude is great, I think Claude 3.5 Sonnet is way better than OpenAI's GPT-4. It understands and follows instructions better, and the context length is larger too. Despite GPT-4 having some context length, too (duh), it often acts as if I started over. It fails at programming for me, and for basic stuff, like "giving movie recommendations without duplicates". If I send it twice or thrice, there will be duplicates despite having it instructed to omit them. As long as Anthropic does not dumb their own models, they are going to be better than OpenAI, at least for what I use them. So, in the present, Claude is way more useful to me and I am subscribed. Right now, they do not support text-to-speech and imagine generation, but once they do, I would just completely abandon OpenAI. > The board of OpenAI is supposedly going to "determine the fate of the world", robotics to be "completely solved" by 2020, the goal of OpenAI is to "avoid an AGI dictatorship". Given the above, I doubt it is going to be OpenAI at this rate. It seems better for educational purposes given that it shows you the code with modifications in real-time and you can run Python scripts for example, but that said, I have not tried the "Educational" style for Claude.