5 ms·
Harsh dude, why not just keep quiet?
by xupybd 2y ago
Harsh dude, why not just keep quiet?
- sublinear 2y agoSick and tired of any server-side rendering of web pages. If you don't have to deal with incident response you can be quiet. It doesn't scale and it complicates meeting any client requirements. Get this trash outta here. For real.
- xupybd 2y agoI worked with server side rendering for close to a decade. It's very reliable.
- sublinear 2y ago[flagged]
- xupybd 2y agoWhat happens when your static stie infrastructure goes down? I fear your argument is turtles all the way down. Edit: I'll show this to my boss. I'm sure he'll get a chuckle.
- tock 2y agoDo you feel the same way about SSR for non static websites vs an SPA?
- sublinear 2y agoSPAs are not necessarily SSR. Can you clarify your question?
- sublinear 2y agoIt's not reliable when your precious servers go down because they're far more complicated than one that simply runs apache or nginx and needs constant patching. (fully aware of the origin of the name "apache")
- recursivedoubts 2y agoand yet here we find ourselves, exchanging our server side rendered opinions on the matter
- xupybd 2y agoEach comment should be entered into the code then committed. That commit then should trigger the CI build. That should then upload the static assets to the CDN. It's clearly the optimal solution.
- sublinear 2y agoThat's the most nonsensical bs I've read in a while do you even know what CI is? Can you break down line by line what this probable CI script you're supposing looks like and explain business justification why a static file would ever be uploaded more than once?
- xupybd 2y agoSo you can have comments
- jph00 2y ago<div class="commtext c5A">Sick and tired of any server-side rendering of web pages.<p>If you don't have to deal with incident response you can be quiet.<p>It doesn't scale and it complicates meeting any client requirements. Get this trash outta here. For real.</div> Ummm... do you know where you are? Do you know how this works? Hint -- try "view source" right now. I made it easy for you by pasting a random snippet above...
- sublinear 2y agoI'm on a niche website full of people who are either too inexperienced to know what I mean or too managerial to give a fuck.
- spirodonfl 2y agoTrue. Literally ZERO people on here have any idea what you're talking about. Generalization confirmed as fact.
- spirodonfl 2y agoImagine being this delusional
- sublinear 2y agoGo ahead and tell me how cacheable your SSR page is. If it was a static file? Oh yeah it never changes! How convenient! Maybe that's the point! People who promote SSR are simply trying to rope frontend devs into their P2 or P1 incident responses and use them as whipping boys. This shit has to stop. If you don't suspect your web devs are doing all kinds of cache-busting dog shit on your backend ruining your performance dude idk what to tell you other than: what year do you think it is and who do you think you hired? It's SSR nonsense constantly spammed on sites like this that make you think it's a good idea and ultimately give inexperienced devs the green light to do all kinds of dumb shit that carries heavy technical debt once you need to meet an SLA that is more realistic than anyone who seriously uses HTMX on anything at that scale. There's no excuse for using tools like this other than ignorance.
- xupybd 2y agoWhy can't you use HTMX with a static back end? It's a front end library?
- spirodonfl 2y agoWho hurt you?