3 ms·
Also - upon sign up why not just log the user in and take them to the dashboard instead of requiring them to log in again. Seems pretty straightforward and I w
by yiggydyang 14y ago
Also - upon sign up why not just log the user in and take them to the dashboard instead of requiring them to log in again.
Seems pretty straightforward and I was able to figure it out easily - you sign up, set up buildings, add units, publish a site, and then voila people come to your site and search, request building units for rent or lease or whatever.
However I suspect your average building landlord or property manager might have a harder time figuring it out. Lots of tabs, lots of fields to fill out, and the navigation is a bit clunky.
In summary - I got the crux of the service and it seems pretty solid for an MVP. The design and ux need a lot of work and your landing page should do a better job of summarizing what the web site does.
Cheers
- padseeker 14y agothank you so much, the is the best quality feedback yet. Yeah, its solid for an MVP. The design needs work. I'm glad you found it straightforward - that is the most important thing. I agree that the average landlord will have a few issues. It needs lots more help icons/popovers (via bootstrap). Also it makes sense to hide some of the tabs until a user has data in there. The tabs are clunky, something I may be able to improve using bootstrap. The biggest consensus is the landing page sucks. Not that I am hearing it I would agree - but I think it was a blind spot since I've focused on the code and functionality for so long. I have my list of priorities now, and improving the landing page is now #1.