3 ms·
True it's probably easier to survive on earth in some luxury bunker than on Mars no matter how much we destroy earth. Alternative theories: billionaire space to
by lyu07282 2y ago
True it's probably easier to survive on earth in some luxury bunker than on Mars no matter how much we destroy earth. Alternative theories: billionaire space tourism, it was never really about mars but about asteroid mining, it was never about mars he just wants the government subsidies
- ben_w 2y ago> True it's probably easier to survive on earth in some luxury bunker than on Mars no matter how much we destroy earth. Definitely, and by a large margin. If I said Mars combines the warmth of Antarctica with the moisture of the Sahara, the air pressure of the peak of Mount Everest, the environmental quality of a superfund cleanup site, the surface illumination after the 1883 Krakatoa explosion and subsequent volcanic winter, and the UV radiation from a completely destroyed ozone layer… …if I said all that, I'd be understating how harsh Mars is. The most positive thing I can say about colonising Mars is that the mere ability to actually do so will mean being able to recover from any possible catastrophe that comes our way.
- dr_kiszonka 2y agoLooking at his ventures, I think he is after power and leverage.