2 ms·
As far as I know, Freudian psychoanalysis has been dead academically as long as I've been alive. Complaining about it is pretty close to complaining about how p
by wpietri 2y ago
As far as I know, Freudian psychoanalysis has been dead academically as long as I've been alive. Complaining about it is pretty close to complaining about how physics is stuffed with all these people who believe in the lumineferous aether. [1]
Were a lot of Freud's initial ideas discredited? Definitely. But the same is true of Isaac Newton, who was an alchemist and theologian. Consider his recipe for curing plague with toad amulets. [2]
The beginnings of any sort of knowledge are messy. But progress is possible.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luminiferous_aether https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luminiferous_aether
[2] https://www.theguardian.com/books/2020/jun/02/isaac-newton-plague-cure-toad-vomit https://www.theguardian.com/books/2020/jun/02/isaac-newton-p...
- Der_Einzige 2y ago[flagged]
- superfunny 2y agoWhen I was studying literature a few decades ago, psychoanalysis still thrived within critical literary analysis.
- wpietri 2y agoSorry, I should have specified that I was talking about psychology and sociology. Happy to believe it was part of crit lit then.