3 ms·
I'd guess that a microwave would "waste" more energy as it's got moving parts and the energy isn't completely directed to heating the water. A kettle also "wast
by ndsipa_pomu 2y ago
I'd guess that a microwave would "waste" more energy as it's got moving parts and the energy isn't completely directed to heating the water. A kettle also "wastes" some energy as you end up heating the kettle too (from the hot water).
If a microwave was more efficient, I'd expect to see premium kettles that used microwaves instead of a simple heating element, though maybe there'd be design problems with preventing leaking microwaves.
- TheSpiceIsLife 2y agoAgree, at least to some extent. For my use cases, I’m not looking to actually boil the water, bringing it up to 80 plus degrees suffices. The inefficiency kettles bring is the tendency of certain users to heat way more water than their immediate needs.