4 ms·
This sounds horribly restrictive.
by osigurdson 2y ago
This sounds horribly restrictive.
- zxcvbnm69 2y ago[dead]
- alkonaut 2y agoI don't even use copilot (yet) because the process of reviewing it through all the different obstacles (security, legal, budget) is on it's 24th month or something. I think many people in traditional industry can relate.
- pc86 2y agoCorporations having IT governance and some restrictions on what apps you can install on company hardware is not remotely new or surprising. Sometimes it causes issues, 99% of the time it's fine.
- bee_rider 2y agoIt seems like it ought to be reasonably restrictive to install some new AI tool on dev machines. * they don’t know who’s behind it, what’ll it output? * they don’t know the business model. Is will it be used to exfiltrate code from the company, aka train on the company’s codebase? Other text files you open? I’m not at all saying I think Cursor is doing that—training on customer data would be a completely unethical business practice, bordering on malware, usually companies whose names get bounced around here are not so bad. But, the hypothetical host company doesn’t know anything about them, so it is prudent to require some checking.
- yunohn 2y agoI’m not sure of any company that blindly allows software like Cursor, that explicitly uploads code/embeddings to their servers.