> Couldn’t they add something in their TOS indicating that AI assistance is common and they aren’t responsible for what their content creators do? They (1) do

> Couldn’t they add something in their TOS indicating that AI assistance is common and they aren’t responsible for what their content creators do? They (1) do have a policy (and separate standardized fan/creator contract) about their limited responsibility for fan/creator interactions, and that contract includes a fan acknowledgement that creators may use third-party assistance in interactions, but also (2) a policy that requires creator to explicitly disclose any AI-created content as AI-created.