3 ms·
Could you both expand on what you mean? I've built some useful stuff with langchain v1 but gave up on porting it to v2, looked like too much work.
by a_bonobo 2y ago
Could you both expand on what you mean? I've built some useful stuff with langchain v1 but gave up on porting it to v2, looked like too much work.
- pkkkzip 2y ago[flagged]
- tonyoconnell 2y agoLangchain abstracts too much and you can't really see what's going on or control the flow of data with real precision. They are fixing that though and now you have much better visibility into what's being inferred. I think Langchain is pretty useful though, especially if you want to integrate with something quickly.
- _neil 2y agoI think this is the reasonable answer. Langchain gets a lot of derision and rightly so but it does have uses for prototyping. It’s also a good resource for learning the landscape specifically because of the integrations. I haven’t used it in a while so I’m not familiar with the most recent updates.
- mavelikara 2y agoThanks for explaining.