Not a single one of those examples is relevant. > secure boot can't be disabled - arguing for the ability of fine scale control on "secure boot" > only ins

Not a single one of those examples is relevant. > secure boot can't be disabled - arguing for the ability of fine scale control on "secure boot" > only install apps from the app store - arguing for "install apps with known behaviors" and "specifically identified hardware access" > programmatic ad blocking is too dangerous - arguing for fine scale filters that the user has awareness of and the ability to choose specific types of content to remove > replacement parts have to be genuine - arguing for "parts with tested and verified behaviors" documented by a reliable testing agency with layers of verifiable history and previous known functional parts supported by users with well documented case study examples > forbidden from performing maintenance on your electric car - arguing for "you as the user can do literally anything you want to your own car (within the known legal limits of your state or nationality)" rather than having the auto company install a bunch of secondary BS you have no idea what its actually doing > we can't let you have unrestricted AI access - arguing "each user can download whatever variation of each 'AI' each user desires tailored toward their own specific use cases" > let you see the source code of your cellular chip - arguing for the "right to maintain, disassemble, and repair your own hardware" if you've bought the hardware > we scan all your private photo uploads for csam - arguing for "no one anywhere is allowed to have external access to your hardware without an extremely well documented rationale."