If the victims wanted to be victimized again just because people offer more money to continue the victimization operation, sure. Unfortunately, giving the vict

If the victims wanted to be victimized again just because people offer more money to continue the victimization operation, sure. Unfortunately, giving the victims no choice in who owns this stuff means allowing it to be reused for the same harm. Money is not the only variable in the equation. This is not a legal interpretation of the judges decision.