3 ms·
Intrinsic motivation can be better than extrinsic motivation. Google won a lot of fans and dedicated employees with its original version of 20% time that encour
by WorldMaker 2y ago
Intrinsic motivation can be better than extrinsic motivation. Google won a lot of fans and dedicated employees with its original version of 20% time that encouraged people to find stuff they were highly motivated to want to work on and could do so relatively safely in the company's sandbox. It is possible this sort "everything the company needs you to do can be done in one afternoon each week" could be an incredible "80% time" company. There are lots of people that would find "80% of my time at the company is my own" to be quite motivating.
Of course, certainly not in the example scenario above where one layer of management is effectively lying to another layer. That's not a healthy "80% time" when it involves duplicity and covert play acting.
But if you were feeling crazy enough to try to build an overt "80% time" company you likely wouldn't have a hard time finding some of the "most talented" people.
- em-bee 2y agowasn't xerox parx effectively like that?
- WorldMaker 2y agoThat's certainly how Xerox PARC is described in some of the tales of their classic discoveries/inventions/Demos. Certain decades of Bell Labs, too, have that glimmer of a bunch of the smartest people allowed to explore stuff they cared about with only the oversight from fellow technical people. I've even heard Microsoft Research can still sometimes feel a bit like that, though with all the pressures of academia like grant finding and patent applications and other such hustles.