5 ms·
They were never really properly investigated. Eban's "Bottle of Lies" book is shocking: https://www.katherineeban.com/bottleoflies https://www.katherineeban.co
by RachelF 2y ago
They were never really properly investigated.
Eban's "Bottle of Lies" book is shocking: https://www.katherineeban.com/bottleoflies https://www.katherineeban.com/bottleoflies
Peter Attia on Youtube also did an investigation on this.
If you're lucky your drugs have the right amount of the active ingredient.
If you're unlucky they have chalk dust in them.
If you're even more unlucky, they have carcinogens in them.
- ronald_raygun 2y agothe term carcinogen is very broad, I think you just mean the bad ones can cause harm (sorry, former CA resident here)
- cyanydeez 2y agoCarcinogens cause cancer. Not just random harm.
- pas 2y agoCause with some probability, right? What's the increase in relative and absolute risk? (+ dose?)
- evoke4908 2y ago> the term carcinogen is very broad No, it is very much not. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/carcinogen https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/carcinogen > I think you just mean the bad ones can cause harm There are no "good" carcinogens. They're all bad. They all cause harm and cancer because that's the one and only meaning of that term.