> As a claim, it's antique -- it would easily have been a view of Turing and others many decades ago. Absolutely. We discussed this in the 90s and were of the

> As a claim, it's antique -- it would easily have been a view of Turing and others many decades ago. Absolutely. We discussed this in the 90s and were of the opinion, then, that event state of the art NNs (in the 90s) wouldn't get much more complex because of their actual mathematical descriptions. It's all the bells and whistles around managing training, and real-world input/output translation code. The core or 'general case' always will be tiny.