3 ms·
Just in case you see this (I left it a bit late)... My stance is one supported by Stephen Fry whom I absolutely adore. It's nice to see that at least he can acc
by mibbitier 14y ago
Just in case you see this (I left it a bit late)... My stance is one supported by Stephen Fry whom I absolutely adore. It's nice to see that at least he can accept the argument.
http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2009/04/21/stephen-fry-it-doesnt-matter-what-you-call-marriage/ http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2009/04/21/stephen-fry-it-doesnt-m...
- danparsonson 14y agoWell there we go - thank you for that. There is however a crucial difference between: > Some people oppose the redefinition of the word "marriage" to include unions other than a man and a woman (your original post) and > It doesn’t matter what you call marriage (Stephen Fry) If you agree with him then perhaps you could choose your words more carefully next time - Stephen's position is one of indifference, not opposition. On the other hand, if you still feel 'oppose' is the right word then he doesn't support you, he's just disinclined to argue with you ;-)