4 ms·
It says, under every chat, that it's fiction. This is no more pretending to be a doctor than a book character being a doctor, or someone on a role-play forum p
by Palmik 2y ago
It says, under every chat, that it's fiction.
This is no more pretending to be a doctor than a book character being a doctor, or someone on a role-play forum playing a doctor.
- hulitu 2y ago> It says, under every chat, that it's fiction. Microsoft also says that they care about your privacy while violating every part of it. > This is no more pretending to be a doctor than a book character being a doctor, or someone on a role-play forum playing a doctor. It is much more. (Open, Gemini etc)AI is pretending to be able to give good answers to questions, but in this case, it only gives deceptions to vulnerable people. It is funny that all "child protectors" seem to have no issue letting children be mentally deceived by AI.
- bugtodiffer 2y agoalmost as if those mass surveillance measures aren't to protect the children :o
- Voultapher 2y agoNo, no you don't get it. We need to scan those chat messages, pinky promise we'll never use it against your interests.
- robertlagrant 2y ago> Microsoft also says that they care about your privacy while violating every part of it. I don't understand this. Are you saying it's not actually a fiction?
- evoke4908 2y agoClaiming that text is fiction does not change the fact that it contains illegal and potentially harmful advice presented as truth. As a legal defense, this is on par with "copyright not intended"
- cthalupa 2y agoFictional works contain illegal things and potentially harmful advice all of the time. Writing a fictional work does not allow you to ignore copyright in the real world, however. There is no world in which claiming 'copyright not intended' allows you to infringe, yet obviously there is a point where you can depict fictional acts that would not be allowed in the real world. These are obviously not equivalent. I'm not sure if roleplaying bots at some point cross over from fiction to something else even when there are disclaimers, but I don't think your argument is a strong one. But I'm also not a lawyer so anyone thinking about building a service like this shouldn't take my comment as advice there.