3 ms·
Difference sure. But the kid knew he was interacting with a simulation. Also, unless something more damning comes out, my feelings on topics like this default t
by conductr 2y ago
Difference sure. But the kid knew he was interacting with a simulation. Also, unless something more damning comes out, my feelings on topics like this default to parental responsibility. If you let your kid with all these known issues interact with new technology that mimics real people with real thoughts, don’t be so shocked when you dislike what those thoughts might be.
- mplewis 2y agoThe child is a child! Their brain is not fully developed. They do not have the faculties to safely navigate a highly interactive tool that seems to be having a real conversation with them.
- gredbeard 2y agoRight, which is why a parent should be more involved from the beginning here.
- conductr 2y agoYes! This is exactly my point. Also, not sure why we treat our kids like such weak snowflakes. This “kid” is 17. That’s damn near being an adult and able to be sent off to die in wars. Scissors are great tools, don’t sue the scissor company because you can’t teach your kids to walk with them, the parent has the primary role in everything.
- ToucanLoucan 2y ago> Difference sure. But the kid knew he was interacting with a simulation. I propose a model called "Schrodinger's AI Enthusiast" where it is observed that an AI enthusiast will insist with a straight face on the one hand that fancy autocomplete word generators are intelligent and the path to true AGI machines/programs and will on the other hand assume that any time any of those same products cause negative effects or have negative outcomes that it is the fault of the user misunderstanding that it's simply a tool.