> I interpreted your reply as more akin to.. That was my reply exactly, except I would've used fewer big words ;) I guess conversation and arguments like this

> I interpreted your reply as more akin to.. That was my reply exactly, except I would've used fewer big words ;) I guess conversation and arguments like this still follow the same rules as formal logic - they're just applied in a fuzzier way. I generally tend to avoid the less wrong set. While there is some good stuff on there, the bulk of it to me seems to be overwhelmingly arrogant and self-absorbed, which doesn't seem to strike me as likely to pick up any new biases, just regurgitate old ones.