3 ms·
The rasterization of the Unicode character will be cached in the glyph cache just like the rest of the glyphs, so the GIF is not really any cheaper.
by jrmuizel 14y ago
The rasterization of the Unicode character will be cached in the glyph cache just like the rest of the glyphs, so the GIF is not really any cheaper.
- lucian1900 14y agoOk, SVG, character and GIF are better than a bunch of CSS :)
- hei_zen 14y agoYou misunderstood a lot of things. Most importantly that replacing a graphic with a unicode char has something to do with CSS :-)
- lucian1900 14y agoMy original comment is a reply to the suggestion to use a CSS icon.
- user-id 14y agoWell, using the :before or :after pseudo-selector and content property is a possibility.
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]