>they properly cooperate with the process and demonstrate they they do not have >the documents instead of refusing to provide them. You make the assumption tha

>they properly cooperate with the process and demonstrate they they do not have >the documents instead of refusing to provide them. You make the assumption that it's practically possible to prove a negative like that. For example, prove that unicorns don't exist ... maybe you just haven't looked long and hard enough. > Jones lied and continues to lie to this day about why he lost the case because > it's a liar and a con man and the claim he's persecuted unfairly helps him > sell his supplements to his audience. If all that Alex did was lie, I don't think anyone would care about him. Clearly he's been on the political radar because his "conspiracy theories" too often turned out to be true.. I don't think you're being very charitable to his audience. People enjoy listening to a counter negative to the mainstream narrative. And some people find great value in it, enough to support him by buying his supplements. Alex speaks in hyperbolic ways, people can make whatever they want of that. If he calls P. Diddy a deep state demon, for example. Is that a lie? Demons don't exist. Sure. But can humans approach demon like behaviour. I think so.