> but should have said wealth inequality to avoid any technicalities. But that would be an entirely different discussion, and one not particularly interesting

> but should have said wealth inequality to avoid any technicalities. But that would be an entirely different discussion, and one not particularly interesting as the wealth inequality impact is much more clear. Regardless of how we landed here, we did, and I think it is an interesting topic that is worth diving into. You must agree, given your continued participation?