3 ms·
You can use bots or you can bid your true maximum and receive the best price available below it. You can't snipe a true higher still sealed bid not matter how g
by rtkwe 2y ago
You can use bots or you can bid your true maximum and receive the best price available below it. You can't snipe a true higher still sealed bid not matter how good your bot is. If all the sniping bidder are above the sealed bidders then the auction still functions to discover higher prices just not as efficiently.
> this format and you'd have zero activity until the millisecond before bids were due followed by a mountain of lawsuits.
Sure but no one does, the eBay model is a compromise to make the bidding structure more familiar to people who don't understand the second price mechanism. Major auctions don't need to make that accommodation, the audience can be relied on to read and think about the auction structure which is unfortunately not an option you can really take for a mass market tool.
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> can't snipe a true higher still sealed bid not matter how good your bot is Of course you can. You repeatedly enter marginally-higher bids until you crest their limit. The only case where the auction is efficient is if the automatic bidder is the highest and someone else bids up to their maximum. > can't snipe a true higher still sealed bid not matter how good your bot is Correct. But eBay doesn't have sealed bids. You can absolutely snipe an auto-bidder; this is like the first high-speed algorithm that was ever developed in the real markets. > no one does Literally pointed you to an eBay bidding bot. > the eBay model is a compromise to make the bidding structure more familiar to people who don't understand the second price mechanism ...yes. The eBay model is a compromise that works for unsophisticated bidders and low-value auctions. eBay's model is a known-flawed model that does not "discover the best price an item can be sold for in a reasonably constrained time" [1]. [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42389361 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42389361
- rtkwe 2y ago> You repeatedly enter marginally-higher bids until you crest their limit. That's not sniping. Inherent to last second sniping is you get a limited amount of chances to boost your bids, in the best case you're taking one shot at the bid to place it at the last millisecond eBay will accept your bid. You're trying to get the last bid in on an auction so no one has a chance to respond. Incrementally bidding up to find the ceiling is directly opposed to the goal of having a sniping bot. > Literally pointed you to an eBay bidding bot. That was talking about other auction runners using the eBay model for extremely high value items because of the complexity of execution, not about people using bots. I know people use bots it's just that to win they have to beat the bid placed by people using the second price functionality. I'm not denying their existence just questioning how effectively they actually distort the auction structure. If a lot of different people (using different bots to avoid GIXEN's automatic mini auction) all place their maximum bids at the last second the winner is still the person with the max bid be that a bot user or a pre bidder. The winning strategy to win that bidding war is still to place your maximum bid in the bot and if everyone does that it's just a normal sealed second price auction. The bot strategy just relies on there not being enough interest in every item and finding one where you can bid less than your maximum and still win which is also true of a pure sealed second price auction. I'm just not seeing where the strategy and outcome differ by including bots if there are second price bidders in the mix bidding their true max.