5 ms·
Easy. European Countries are so small, esp compared to America, and there is a ton of movement between them so need to communicate between countries was high. H
by stackskipton 2y ago
Easy. European Countries are so small, esp compared to America, and there is a ton of movement between them so need to communicate between countries was high. However, SMS between different country cell networks was extremely expensive for various reasons. However, data and data roaming was not. Since WhatApp is entirely data to cellular company, it caught on and network effect took over.
- mettamage 2y agoIt’s also nice to use for calling with US people that are willing to put up with it. How do US people do intentional calls?
- Zak 2y agoMost don't. The few who have international contacts tend to pick whatever their contact uses.
- stackskipton 2y agoDepending on your family/travel background, it's very possible you don't or don't enough to need WhatsApp. We travel overseas but everyone we have met just keep in communication over Facebook. All our family is in the United States. When we are overseas, we just use wifi calling to communicate back home or since most people have iPhones, iMessage/Facetime. My brother is about distance of Moscow to Lisbon from me, still a free call since it's domestic.
- GRiMe2D 2y agoIn addition to that, WhatsApp was available at the time on Symbian devices and Nokia’s S40 devices (I remember downloading Jar and Jad files for button mobile devices, and each update was free up to year then it was a dollar for a year)
- PokemonNoGo 2y agoCrazy! You made me remember i actually once paid for "something" when it comes to Whatsapp! Then they added somekind of disclaimer "will be a paid service xxxxxyyyy" but it never happened! Yes I don't remember what I paid for.
- nottorp 2y agoPretty sure i paid 0.99 for ... something. I don't remember what either. Might have been 1 year of service after the first year.
- PokemonNoGo 2y agoHilarious we both don't know what we even paid for or why!
- nottorp 2y agoBut it seemed all worth it at the time, right?
- gorbypark 2y agoI think it was more or less “nag ware”. I remember clicking “no, later” multiple times in a row and they’d only ask like twice a year. I don’t think it ever stopped working for people who didn’t pay (afaik).
- elbasti 2y agoThe fact that WhatsApp is also gigantic in large countries with no intermobility between them (Mexico, Brazil, Nigeria) would suggest that the only issue that mattered was the fact that ~2011, mobile carriers would charge insane rates for SMS.
- stackskipton 2y agoFor sure, but from what I understand, in some European Countries in 2011, SMS was free if your recipient was inside the country but cost if they were not due to tariffs and interconnect fees. Since Europeans do move between countries thanks to that European Union thing, it became a problem and WhatsApp became the solution. Sure, other countries it might have picked up domestically thanks to high SMS prices but low data prices.
- maxwell 2y agoBut why WhatsApp in Western Europe and Viber on the Balkan Peninsula?
- locallost 2y agoI am not sure this is true. European countries are smaller but they are not that small. The number of people sending SMS to a foreign number regularly is I guess not significant. Potentially it was easier for people working abroad to stay in touch with people back home. If anything like that, it would be more true that it's the cost of SMS within the country - it was always increasingly unlimited but not 10+ years ago, mine was I think 9 cents. If you had like a 1GB of data, then it was a no brainer to save the 9 cents.