4 ms·
No, we need a scientific understanding of autonomous intelligent decision-making. The problem with “agentic AI” is the same old “Artificial Intelligence, Natura
by aithrowawaycomm 2y ago
No, we need a scientific understanding of autonomous intelligent decision-making. The problem with “agentic AI” is the same old “Artificial Intelligence, Natural Stupidity” problem: we have no clue what “reasoning” or “intelligence” or “autonomous” actually means in animals, and trying to apply these terms to AI without understanding them (or inventing a new term without nailing down the underlying concept) is doomed to fail.
- robotresearcher 2y agoThey don’t mean anything precise, and don’t need to. They describe a bag of behaviors with overlapping properties that we observe animals/people doing. ‘Intelligent’ is exactly as precise as ‘funny’ or ‘interesting’. It’s a label for a cluster of observations of another agent’s behavior. It entails almost nothing about how those behaviors are achieved. This is of course only an opinion, but it’s my professional opinion after thirty five years in the AI business.