There's a pretty meaningful distinction between something (relatively) neutral that's occasionally used to support unethical purposes than something that can on

There's a pretty meaningful distinction between something (relatively) neutral that's occasionally used to support unethical purposes than something that can only be used for unethical purposes, plus shades of gray in-between. I don't think there's a reasonable argument that e.g. Keurig engineers need to grapple with the ethical dilemmas of murderers and terrorists using their products for example.