Apologies for the caricature. It’s clearly up for debate, but I’ve always thought that imposing obligations for how people use the product/code, or implying ob

Apologies for the caricature. It’s clearly up for debate, but I’ve always thought that imposing obligations for how people use the product/code, or implying obligations for what the project is “owed” by users, isn’t free as in freedom, or beer. So I don’t think it’s a basic principle of open source. I think some people want it to be though. I get it though. People see aws et al making a business model of hosting FOSS and making boatloads of money doing it, and they don’t like it.