5 ms·
I tend to believe that women initiate encounters with men with unconscious non-verbal signals. A man who is able to read these signals will have a good success
by readme 14y ago
I tend to believe that women initiate encounters with men with unconscious non-verbal signals. A man who is able to read these signals will have a good success rate in meeting new women. A man who cannot will be pegged as a "creeper".
I think it's not only true in real life, but on dating sites as well. Women receive so many messages from men that you are probably just going to get buried in all the noise if you send one. The best approach would be to make a good profile, and wait for them to message you. I'm not saying males initiating contact on these sites won't have any success, but I'd say it's statistically unlikely, comparatively.
It is also a strange coincidence that even on a biological level millions of sperm must compete to fertilize one egg. In lieu of absolute scientific proof (which may or may not exist) I'm fairly confident women are the ones who do the choosing, not us.
For the best results in approaching women, please consider the following flowcharts:
Pre-Approach Flowchart:
<eye contact?> --no--> STOP
|
yes
|
<did it seem adverse?> --yes--> STOP
|
no
|
<is boyfriend present?> --yes--> STOP
|
no
|
APPROACH
Approach Flowchart:
<Did you open by sexually assaulting
this woman, such as by unwanted
touching?> -------------YES---> GO TO JAIL
|
<Did you open with a pick-up line?> --YES--> FAIL
|
<Did you open with a cowardly question
such as: do you have the time?> --YES--> FAIL
|
<Did you confidently introduce yourself
or say something very interesting?> --NO--> FAIL
|
yes
|
<Was it reciprocated?> --NO--> Nice try anyway
|
yes
|
+-- <Are you and her still exchanging mutual -- NO
| conversation?> |
| | |
| YES |
| | |
NO---<Do you think it is time to end it?> |
| +--------------------------+
YES |
| |
| |
<Did you end it?>--NO---[Your odds worsened]
| |
YES |
| |
<Did you agree to meet --------+
again or go somewhere
else together immediately?>--NO--+
| |
WIN ------------YES |
|
+--------------------------
|
<Did you get her number?>--NO-- Maybe you
| will see her again.
YES
|
Call soon or she will forget who
you are. Don't leave a message the
first time. Don't call more than
two times in the first week. If
very desperate and no luck after two
you may try calling once more in a week,
but seriously, move on...
- gavanwoolery 14y agoWhat kind of creep makes a flowchart about hitting on women? Just kidding, nicely done. ;)
- readme 14y agoA retired creep who has a permanent girlfriend ;)
- jessedhillon 14y agoSir -- Well done.
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- boboblong 14y ago"Did you open by sexually assaulting this woman, such as by unwanted touching?" Touching someone on the shoulder is not sexual assault. Let's try to keep things in perspective, please--if simply touching a member of a particular group warrants jail time, that group is an overclass.
- DanBC 14y agoDepends on the touch. No one has suggested this warrants jail time. People are saying, and quite reasonably I think, that you should keep your hands to yourself. Shaking hands = fine. Tapping shoulder or top outside of arm = less fine, but acceptable in a narrow range of situations. Placing cupped hand on shoulder of a stranger, with squeezing or stroking, with "friendly banter" = really not okay.
- boboblong 14y ago"Placing cupped hand on shoulder of a stranger, with squeezing or stroking, with "friendly banter" = really not okay." Nope, still not worth jail time. Move away from the person or grab their hand and remove it from your shoulder. I'm sorry, but you do not get to have people arrested for giving you an unwanted shoulder rub. If they persist, then yeah, they're assaulting (and harassing) you. Again, let's have some perspective.