4 ms·
There are countless documents showing his contempt of court, failure to produce discovery, etc.
by judge2020 2y ago
There are countless documents showing his contempt of court, failure to produce discovery, etc.
- Nathanba 2y ago[flagged]
- yladiz 2y agoIt’s been proven in court.
- jjeaff 2y agoYou seem to be completely uninformed about the case. Jones has repeatedly defied the court, hidden evidence, refused to comply. He spent years lying about the parents causing them to be harassed constantly. Ruining their already ruined lives. He caused these parents to have to move multiple times to get away from his insane listeners. All the while, privately, Jones knew he was wrong. We know this from his private communications that his own attorneys accidentally turned over. To this day, Jones continues to spout lies about the court and the judge after multiple court orders and contempts of court. No amount of money is enough to undo the damage Jones has done. But taking it all is at least a start. He is a sociopathic cancer and deserves to be in jail.
- JacobThreeThree 2y agoActually, the default judgement doesn't go into any specifics about what he failed to produce in discovery. The Jones lawyers argued that the discovery requests were for documents that don't exist, and that's why they were not produced.
- ceejayoz 2y ago> The Jones lawyers argued that the discovery requests were for documents that don't exist, and that's why they were not produced. And then they accidentally sent all of the non-existent documents to the plaintiffs, showing Jones had committed perjury. And then they forgot to claim it as privileged in a timely fashion. And then Jones got confronted with the lie in court. And then they got sanctioned for the fuckup. Oops. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alex-jones-lawyers-accidentally-leak-years-emails-infowars-financial-d-rcna41378 https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alex-jones-lawyers-acci... https://apnews.com/article/legal-proceedings-fraud-crime-connecticut-texas-2c5bca5300b2bda02b60f6181632be6d https://apnews.com/article/legal-proceedings-fraud-crime-con...
- JacobThreeThree 2y ago>And then they accidentally sent all of the non-existent documents to the plaintiffs That's not what these two linked articles say. The AP articles about this state that the improper conduct was about disclosure of information the plaintiffs had sent the Jones legal team. Nothing to do with discovery that was requested from Jones.
- ceejayoz 2y agohttps://www.newstimes.com/news/article/Alex-Jones-cellphone-records-were-mistakenly-17348921.php https://www.newstimes.com/news/article/Alex-Jones-cellphone-... > During parts of his testimony stretching over two days in a Texas courtroom, Jones repeatedly told jurors that he does not use email and that he had searched the contents of his phone for messages pertaining to Sandy Hook after he was sued by several family members of the victims for falsely saying the shooting was a hoax. > Jones said that his phone search, done during the discovery phase of the trial, did not turn up any relevant messages. Texas Judge Maya Guerra Gamble has already ruled in favor of Sandy Hook parents Neil Heslin and Scarlett Lewis by default, saying that Jones did not comply with the rules of discovery in the case.
- JacobThreeThree 2y agoOkay, this is a different article. Nevertheless, this one liner about this topic does not specify what the discovery requests were. If the request was about finding text messages regarding a specific topic, as the term "relevant" implies, then just because text messages from Jones exist (and were improperly disclosed), doesn't speak to whether or not those text messages were relevant in this context or not.
- ceejayoz 2y ago"repeatedly told jurors that he does not use email" is a hard claim to sustain when your emails get handed over later on.