4 ms·
Well, yeah, obviously. But my point is that you do need a solution to the measurement problem in order to model measurements in any way other than simply punti
by lisper 2y ago
Well, yeah, obviously. But my point is that you do need a solution to the measurement problem in order to model measurements in any way other than simply punting and introducing randomness as a postulate.
- 11101010001100 2y agoAnd is that solution required to be deterministic? If so, that is another postulate.
- lisper 2y agoYou have to either postulate randomness or describe how it arises from determinism. I don't see any other logical possibility. BTW, see this: https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9906015 https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9906015 for a valiant effort to extract randomness from determinism, and this: https://blog.rongarret.info/2019/07/the-trouble-with-many-worlds.html https://blog.rongarret.info/2019/07/the-trouble-with-many-wo... for my critique.