3 ms·
I guess I wasn't thinking of a PERFECT simulation. Now it's obvious to me that you would have to simulate exactly what the universe is doing down to the smalle
by onlyrealcuzzo 2y ago
I guess I wasn't thinking of a PERFECT simulation.
Now it's obvious to me that you would have to simulate exactly what the universe is doing down to the smallest level to get a perfect simulation.
Thanks.
Is it really impossible to get a very close approximation without simulating down to the atomic level, though?
- zh3 2y agoA close approximation should arguably include collapses/slides, which happen spontaneously because the pile organises itself to a critical angle; then an incredibly small event can trigger a large slide of salt/sand/whatever/rocks (or whatever else the pile is made of). Even working out something like "What's the biggest and smallest slides that could occur given a pile of some particular substance?". Every approximation will by definition deviate from what really happens - I suppose that's why we talk of "working approximations", i.e. they work well enough for a given purpose. So it probably comes down to what the approximation is being used for. There is the idea that we are all living in a simulation; if so maybe if we look closely enough at the detail all the way from the universe to atoms then we'll start to see some fuzziness (well, of course there's quantum physics....).