4 ms·
Very peculiar examples. Do you object to the section about the harassment of Lorenz or the absence of a section on harassment for Christopher Rufo?
by chowchowchow 2y ago
Very peculiar examples. Do you object to the section about the harassment of Lorenz or the absence of a section on harassment for Christopher Rufo?
- ChadNauseam 2y agoI'm not sure what needs to be in the Wikipedia article. But I think that's not necessary to say that, when all I'm accusing Wikipedia of is a double standard. If I said "the justice system gives men harsher sentences than women for the same crime", I wouldn't necessarily have to know whether men should be given more lenient sentences or women should be given harsher sentences, if I only wanted to say that the current situation is unfair and something should change. I think it's fine to put all of Rufo's controversial stuff at the beginning of his article, but they didn't do it for Lorenz, and I didn't see a plausible reason other than "they like Lorenz and don't like Rufo".
- chowchowchow 2y agoI think it is necessary to say that if you want to make a meaningful critique since otherwise you can simply point out differences in any two articles and call that bias.