It is absurd to call this license change stealing when the previous work is still available under the original license. This is more like someone who is giving

It is absurd to call this license change stealing when the previous work is still available under the original license. This is more like someone who is giving to the community, still continuing to give, but with a slightly more strict license. Do you expect someone who is doing philantropic work, gets contributions from others, but later becomes less philantropic to change their name? > NEVER NEVER NEVER have had the traction There is plenty of even closed source software which has traction in many domains, let alone software released under a license which as anti-rez points out allows the users to freely run their websites on redis, modify and redistribute code etc.(with the exception of running hosting services like Amazon). For instance, it would be amazing and a great improvement if there was a top-quality CAD program with a similar license to Redis.