3 ms·
> a company could expand their offerings with a less robust safety record But would people take it? I mean, if one service is 25% cheaper but there are a bunc
by crazygringo 2y ago
> a company could expand their offerings with a less robust safety record
But would people take it?
I mean, if one service is 25% cheaper but there are a bunch of horror stories of their vehicles crashing into highway barriers (like this past October), I'm not sure people are going to get in.
- rogerrogerr 2y agoDriving is 100% cheaper, and there are a bunch of horror stories of people crashing their vehicles into highway barriers. We’re not starting at zero here.
- danans 2y agoIs driving really 100% cheaper? Owning a car has pretty high fixed costs. Also, it's different when you crash a car yourself vs a robot doing it. If you are driving, there is clearer accountability than a robot, so the bar must be much higher for the robot.