3 ms·
The difference is that GM and Ford have no viable strategy for transitioning these features into taxi services, whereas Tesla does. Not sure how it's suddenly
by schiffern 2y ago
The difference is that GM and Ford have no viable strategy for transitioning these features into taxi services, whereas Tesla does.
Not sure how it's suddenly so controversial to realize that Detroit is terrible at software strategy. This has been the conventional wisdom (and with good reason) for quite some time.
- rgovostes 2y agoI briefly owned a Chevy Volt with the worst infotainment UX imaginable. I found a quote from a Chevy spokesperson describing it as an "Apple-like experience," presumably because the graphic designer on Fiverr found the Gradient tool in their pirated copy of Illustrator CS6.
- schiffern 2y agoTrue, but even that's just at the surface level. When you dig into the architecture / planning / business strategy that happens in Detroit, it's even worse than what the UI suggests. "Creative destruction" is coming for them real soon.
- Tagbert 2y agoThat is a 10-year old UI based on their even older designs from their ICE vehicles. The newer UI for the Ultium is much more modern. Not as severely styled as some other companies not not as overdone as that old UI.
- cyberax 2y ago> whereas Tesla does LOL, no. Tesla has a gimmicky car that is supposed to be a taxi, with zero planning for the infrastructure (so far).