4 ms·
> probably be a disaster disaster is a strong word, but yes, it would definitely have issues. but would it be an improvement over what we currently have, for m
by rozap 2y ago
> probably be a disaster
disaster is a strong word, but yes, it would definitely have issues. but would it be an improvement over what we currently have, for most people? that is the standard that matters.
no system will be perfect. i'd argue that no healthcare system will even be that good, knowing human nature, especially given the culture in the US which values the individual's right to obtain money over most everything else. but even given these facts, i think it's defeatist to think that this is honestly the best we can do.
- fastball 2y agoI didn't say it was the best that we can do, merely that I don't think humans currently have the capacity to manage a project of that nature and scope effectively. My alternate proposal would be for states to implement public healthcare on their own, which they can already do.