4 ms·
Abbott districts in New Jersey (which are generally the poorest districts and have higher percentages of black students) have had per student funding at levels
by HideousKojima 2y ago
Abbott districts in New Jersey (which are generally the poorest districts and have higher percentages of black students) have had per student funding at levels equal to or higher than the wealthiest districts in the state for decades. In spite of this the achievement gap has actually widened.
Funding isn't the issue:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abbott_district https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abbott_district
- jaco6 2y agoI’m troubled by the implications of your comment—you seem to be suggesting that no amount of funding increase can bring about racial equality in testing scores. Is that what you meant to suggest?
- WillAdams 2y agoI used to work as a Night Counselor at a school for boys. The biggest stumbling block for lower-income students was their utter disdain for higher-learning or any sort of success which wasn't glorified in rap because that and sports figures were the only successes which they were regularly exposed to in popular media --- the gifted student who had gotten the scholarship and escaped the ghetto was not in general going back there to conduct business or practice medicine or teach. A program where inner city students were required to return to their communities and work to improve them in order to receive their scholarship is about the only way out I can envision.
- HideousKojima 2y agoParental involvement in education is one of the biggest predictors of educational success. Far, far above funding. The teacher's unions and others just want you to throw more money at the problem
- marcusverus 2y ago[flagged]
- 6thvoicein 2y ago[dead]
- silisili 2y agoYes, because that's the truth. You can't just throw money at problems and hope they go away. In fact, it creates incentives for them not to.