3 ms·

I mean if you do whatever you want and call it TDD, of course it doesn't restrict you in any way. But then any discussions about the properties of TDD are point

I mean if you do whatever you want and call it TDD, of course it doesn't restrict you in any way. But then any discussions about the properties of TDD are pointless. Anything you do is "just the right amount of TDD". Anyone who does less is "not doing TDD". Anyone who does more is a "fundamentalist dogmatic obsession-driven..." Yes, really.

motorest 2y ago
> I mean if you do whatever you want and call it TDD (...) If you know what is TDD then you wouldn't make mistakes such as believing each and every single unit of code must have a test. That's specious reasoning and slippery slope sloppy thinking. > But then any discussions about the properties of TDD are pointless. Not really. You're just succumbing to slippery slope sloppy thinking. Adding a red test and working your way up to a green test is self explanatory. Being contrarian just wastes everyone's time.