4 ms·
If you don't mind a one terabyte public key. https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/351.pdf https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/351.pdf
by bwesterb 2y ago
If you don't mind a one terabyte public key. https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/351.pdf https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/351.pdf
- adgjlsfhk1 2y agoalso that paper (IMO) is ridiculously conservative. Just using 1GB keys is plenty sufficient since it would require a quantum computer with a billion bits to decrypt.
- trogdor 2y agoAlthough I know it’s an apocryphal quote, I am reminded of “640K should be enough for anybody.” The Intel 4004, in 1971, had only 2,250 transistors. A handful of qubits today might become a billion sooner than you think.
- adgjlsfhk1 2y agoit took until 2011 before Sandy bridge cracked 2 billion. If we get 40 years of quantum resistance from 1GB RSA, that would be pretty great.
- Vecr 2y agoHow long does it take to generate a key that big? What probabilities do you need to put on generating a composite number and not a prime? Does the prime need extra properties?
- adgjlsfhk1 2y agoBased on https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/351.pdf https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/351.pdf it would be about 1900 core hours (but I'm pretty sure optimized implementations could bring it down a bunch). No extra properties needed and moderate probability is sufficient.