4 ms·
It’s only expensive if you’re getting less than 50$/month of value from it, at which point don’t subscribe. This isn’t something I’d pay for right now, but whe
by Retric 2y ago
It’s only expensive if you’re getting less than 50$/month of value from it, at which point don’t subscribe. This isn’t something I’d pay for right now, but when I was doing this kind of work regularly it would have been an easy purchase.
Subscription models don’t mesh well with casual users. However, if it’s going to save you hours of work every month then it’s a perfectly reasonable price point.
- throwaway290 2y agoWould you sub for $50 if you were getting $51 per month of value?:) Any alternative where you pay $10 for $15 value or you pay $100 for $150 value will beat this
- Retric 2y ago> Would you sub for $50 if you whee getting $51 Personally no, 50$/month of value covers not just 30$/month, but also the overhead of yet another subscription. So paying 10 for 15 doesn’t make much sense IMO, but $100 for $150 does.
- throwaway290 2y agoYep. It is not black and white