4 ms·

As I said, using HTMX isn't "minimal to no JS". I agree that HTMX can be fast - but that's not what we're talking about. Even in the video of converting a React

As I said, using HTMX isn't "minimal to no JS". I agree that HTMX can be fast - but that's not what we're talking about. Even in the video of converting a React app to HTMX you linked the presenter literally says - "no JavaScript, just HTMX" - but HTMX is written in guess what? Very dishonest.

recursivedoubts 2y ago
i think it's reasonable to call htmx "minimal JS" in that it is relatively small, dependency free, can be used without a typical javascript build chain (npm, etc.) and frees the end user of writing javascript in many cases the speaker is referring to them not needing to write javascript for a specific feature, which is true, but they do use scripting for some aspects of the application, which is perfectly acceptable in hypermedia-driven applications: https://htmx.org/essays/hypermedia-friendly-scripting/ https://htmx.org/essays/hypermedia-friendly-scripting/ regardless, the wins are obvious
- jakubmazanec 2y ago
  > call htmx "minimal JS" "Minimal", maybe, "small to no", nay :D
  - troad 2y ago
    > "Minimal", maybe, "small to no", nay :D Considering the original phrase was 'minimal or no', I am glad that you now agree. > you linked the presenter literally says - "no JavaScript, just HTMX" - but HTMX is written in guess what? Very dishonest. It's difficult to take this seriously. Just wait until you find out most of Python is written in C! Very dishonest!
    - jakubmazanec 2y ago
      On the contrary, you are still wrong. HTMX is simply using JavaScript and looking at it, it isn't minimal (it's still 15 kB min+gzip). > It's difficult to take this seriously. Just wait until you find out most of Python is written in C! Very dishonest! Now I understand, you're just obtuse.
      - troad 2y ago
        > Now I understand, you're just obtuse. This seems like an exceedingly mean-spirited and unconstructive type of response to have to people who have been giving up their time trying to explain a different point of view to you. I would also gently point out the HN guidelines at this point. I note you haven't responded to my more substantive reply here,[0] so I am unsure you saw it. I would encourage you to read it with less of a zero-sum 'I-win-you-lose' mentality. I won't be engaging with you further though. [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42386090 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42386090

recursivedoubts 2y ago

i think it's reasonable to call htmx "minimal JS" in that it is relatively small, dependency free, can be used without a typical javascript build chain (npm, etc.) and frees the end user of writing javascript in many cases the speaker is referring to them not needing to write javascript for a specific feature, which is true, but they do use scripting for some aspects of the application, which is perfectly acceptable in hypermedia-driven applications: https://htmx.org/essays/hypermedia-friendly-scripting/ https://htmx.org/essays/hypermedia-friendly-scripting/ regardless, the wins are obvious

jakubmazanec 2y ago
> call htmx "minimal JS" "Minimal", maybe, "small to no", nay :D
- troad 2y ago
  > "Minimal", maybe, "small to no", nay :D Considering the original phrase was 'minimal or no', I am glad that you now agree. > you linked the presenter literally says - "no JavaScript, just HTMX" - but HTMX is written in guess what? Very dishonest. It's difficult to take this seriously. Just wait until you find out most of Python is written in C! Very dishonest!
  - jakubmazanec 2y ago
    On the contrary, you are still wrong. HTMX is simply using JavaScript and looking at it, it isn't minimal (it's still 15 kB min+gzip). > It's difficult to take this seriously. Just wait until you find out most of Python is written in C! Very dishonest! Now I understand, you're just obtuse.
    - troad 2y ago
      > Now I understand, you're just obtuse. This seems like an exceedingly mean-spirited and unconstructive type of response to have to people who have been giving up their time trying to explain a different point of view to you. I would also gently point out the HN guidelines at this point. I note you haven't responded to my more substantive reply here,[0] so I am unsure you saw it. I would encourage you to read it with less of a zero-sum 'I-win-you-lose' mentality. I won't be engaging with you further though. [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42386090 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42386090