3 ms·
I'm genuinely curious while skimming Jay’s book, I couldn’t help but notice parallels with LISP-based approaches, which are also tree-structured. How does this
by wslh 2y ago
I'm genuinely curious while skimming Jay’s book, I couldn’t help but notice parallels with LISP-based approaches, which are also tree-structured. How does this differ from those?
Additionally, I have another question: where is this theory [potentially] applied, even if only in niche areas?
Finally, I think there is a glitch in [1] where define "false = t, true = t, etc" I think they meant false = f ? I was mesmerized by a tree representation of not though.
[1] https://treecalcul.us/specification/ https://treecalcul.us/specification/
- mrkeen 2y ago> Additionally, I have another question: where is this theory [potentially] applied, even if only in niche areas? Intermediate languages - write an interpreter, a JIT, or a compiler for the tree calculus. Then write a high-level language that reduces to tree calculus.