6 ms·
>any video produced by Sora would be required to have a form of watermarking that's on par with what intellectual property owners require It's a completely dif
by logicchains 2y ago
>any video produced by Sora would be required to have a form of watermarking that's on par with what intellectual property owners require
It's a completely different thing. IP owners want watermarks on their IP so they can prosecute people who use their IP without giving credit, nobody's forcing them to watermark it.
- phtrivier 2y agoI agree that's why they do it. I happen to think that some states will want to prosecute people who publish realistic-looking AI generated images without making it explicit that they're generated. I'm wondering if watermarking could be an effective tool for that. (If I was on a bad mood, I would say that we should make it explicit when images are too heavily photoshoped, too ; but that's an other debat, because tools like Sora make manufacturing lies several order of magnitude cheaper.)