>but underlying it are real things that provide real future value. This is why spencerflem is correct, and why governments around the world are scrambling to f

>but underlying it are real things that provide real future value. This is why spencerflem is correct, and why governments around the world are scrambling to figure out what to do about sub replacement rate total fertility rates and top heavy population histograms. You can have all the investments and assets and money in the world, but if there are insufficient hands to perform the services and deliver the goods you want (automation notwithstanding), then there is nothing real underlying those numbers on the brokerage statement. The political issue of a top heavy population is clear, the rent seekers, those who want income for doing nothing is directly at odds with the goals of the younger population, because the younger population knows they are going to get less.