3 ms·
Negative mass was what I was going for with "antimass". For some reason I thought that was a common term but I guess it is not.
by nsxwolf 2y ago
Negative mass was what I was going for with "antimass". For some reason I thought that was a common term but I guess it is not.
- westurner 2y agoNot sure why I confused the terms. FWIU this Superfluid Quantum Gravity rejects dark matter and/or negative mass in favor of supervaucuous supervacuum, but I don't think it attempts to predict other phases and interactions like Dark fluid theory? From "Show HN: Physically accurate black hole simulation using your iPhone camera" https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42191692 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42191692 : > Ctrl-F Fedi , Bernoulli, Gross-Pitaevskii: >> "Gravity as a fluid dynamic phenomenon in a superfluid quantum space. Fluid quantum gravity and relativity." (2015) https://hal.science/hal-01248015/ https://hal.science/hal-01248015/ There's a newer paper on it. Alternatives to general relativity > Testing of alternatives to general relativity: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternatives_to_general_relativity#Testing_of_alternatives_to_general_relativity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternatives_to_general_relati... The new Sagittarius* black hole image with phase might help with discarding models unsupported by evidence. Are those knots or braids or fields around a vortical superfluidic attractor system? There doesn't at all appear to be a hard boundary Schwarzschild radius. But that's about not dark matter not antimatter.