> If you think a language that has just one tool is better, then it just means your use-cases are very narrow. Counterpoint from “The Zen of Python”: > There

> If you think a language that has just one tool is better, then it just means your use-cases are very narrow. Counterpoint from “The Zen of Python”: > There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious way to do it. https://peps.python.org/pep-0020/ https://peps.python.org/pep-0020/