4 ms·
It is decades of Arch toxicity, other distros not only Debian based will confirm it. Arch is an OK distro but their kernel is not faster then a Debian kernel,
by simion314 2y ago
It is decades of Arch toxicity, other distros not only Debian based will confirm it. Arch is an OK distro but their kernel is not faster then a Debian kernel, I run Arch for a whle, I compiled the kernel with the flags for my CPU, I build the required modules into the kernel so it loads a second faster, there was no systemd so I also optimized the boot services. I had a ton of free time. But then I did not had free time, and screwing with the kernel and latest upstream bugs was no longer fun. So as an experienced ex Arch user, there is no magic shit Arch puts in their kernel to make it faster, the horror story you hear about Ubuntu is newbs having issue with GNOME and breaking it by tring to put customization in a DE that does not allow it.
- resource_waste 2y agoDebianers have to have an enemy to justify their existence to still use Debian. If not for Arch, they might have tried a good distro.
- simion314 2y ago>they might have tried a good distro. Can you read and comprehend at the same time ? I used Arch and Chakra and other distros. or you claim Arch and the distros are mentioned are BAD.